Logo

CritifyHub

Home Reviews Blogs Community Movie Suggestions Movie Room Sign in
The Exorcist Poster

Title: The Exorcist

Year: 1973

Director: William Friedkin

Writer: William Peter Blatty

Cast: Ellen Burstyn (Chris MacNeil), Linda Blair (Regan MacNeil), Jason Miller (Father Damien Karras), Max von Sydow (Father Lankester Merrin), Lee J. Cobb (Lt. Bill Kinderman),

Runtime: 122 min.

Synopsis: When a charming 12-year-old girl takes on the characteristics and voices of others, doctors say there is nothing they can do. As people begin to die, the girl's mother realizes her daughter has been possessed by the Devil. Her daughter's only possible hope lies with two priests and the ancient rite of demonic exorcism.

Rating: 7.732/10

Beneath the Cross: The Exorcist’s Primal Dance of Faith and Fear

/10 Posted on July 13, 2025
William Friedkin’s *The Exorcist* (1973) remains a cinematic crucible, forging terror and theology into a singular, unsettling experience. Its power lies not in its shocks though they are legion but in its fearless exploration of faith’s fragility against primal evil. Friedkin’s direction is a masterclass in restraint and eruption, wielding silence as deftly as chaos. The Georgetown townhouse, both stately and claustrophobic, becomes a character itself, its creaking stairs and shadowed attic amplifying the dread of a world unraveling. Owen Roizman’s cinematography, with its muted palette and stark contrasts, mirrors the spiritual desolation of Chris MacNeil (Ellen Burstyn) and Father Karras (Jason Miller), whose performances anchor the film’s emotional core. Burstyn’s raw portrayal of a mother watching her daughter, Regan (Linda Blair), dissolve into possession is harrowing, her desperation palpable in every glance. Miller, as the doubting priest, carries a quiet anguish that makes his confrontation with evil feel profoundly personal.

William Peter Blatty’s screenplay, adapted from his novel, is less about horror tropes and more about existential questions: What does it mean to believe when doubt is all-consuming? The dialogue, sharp yet naturalistic, grounds the supernatural in human vulnerability, though it occasionally leans too heavily on exposition, particularly in the medical scenes, which feel protracted and disrupt the film’s rhythm. Yet, this flaw is minor against the film’s audacious refusal to offer easy answers. Its depiction of exorcism is not triumphant but grueling, a battle where faith is as much a weapon as it is a wound.

Mike Oldfield’s *Tubular Bells*, used sparingly, haunts the film’s quieter moments, its repetitive chimes evoking a world teetering on collapse. The sound design Regan’s guttural snarls, the creak of the bed amplifies the visceral horror, making the supernatural feel unnervingly corporeal. Friedkin’s choice to linger on the mundane Chris’s film set, Karras’s aging mother before plunging into chaos underscores the violation of possession, rendering it not just a spectacle but a desecration of the everyday.

*The Exorcist* falters slightly in its pacing, with some secondary characters, like the detective, feeling underdeveloped. Yet, its enduring strength is its refusal to reduce evil to a tidy metaphor. It’s a film that dares to sit in discomfort, asking what we hold onto when the abyss stares back.
0 0